{"id":221,"date":"2009-01-17T12:14:43","date_gmt":"2009-01-17T19:14:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lyspeth.com\/blog\/2009\/01\/17\/privacy-etc-ii\/"},"modified":"2009-01-17T12:16:36","modified_gmt":"2009-01-17T19:16:36","slug":"privacy-etc-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lyspeth.com\/blog\/2009\/01\/17\/privacy-etc-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"Privacy, etc. II"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I got some offline feedback on my last entry, with the effect that I rethought a few things. Here are some of the new thoughts:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Anonymity<\/strong>. The way I defined this previously was &#8220;being out in public without being notable&#8221;. This isn&#8217;t a very good definition, because, as <a href=\"http:\/\/wandreilagh.org\/\">Gavin<\/a> pointed out, anonymity actually has a more technical definition that&#8217;s important to preserve, namely: being in public without being known. So works of art can be anonymous, in that they are well-known but no one knows who made them (they are completely unsigned). Or a person can be anonymous by being in disguise or otherwise completely unrecognized. Or information can be made anonymous, &#8220;unconnected to an identity&#8221;, by purging it of identifying information, like aggregated web search data unconnected to IP address or other similar identifiers.<\/p>\n<p>Gavin suggested that the concept I defined previously could be described as being &#8220;unnotable&#8221; or &#8220;unnoticed&#8221;. Perhaps a better word is needed, but having both concepts is certainly more useful.<\/p>\n<p>Another concept that I didn&#8217;t define explicitly, but left under the umbrella of privacy, is <strong>pseudonymity<\/strong>. This is a very important concept in modern web communications since so much information these days is attached to usernames. When is a pseudonym truly unconnected to a person&#8217;s &#8220;real identity&#8221;? This can be a challenge to determine, and a lot of pseudonymous information is poorly protected because of subtle identifiers in the information or interconnection between pseudonymous information and information filed under a &#8220;real name&#8221;; it can also become an issue when pseudonym or username is used for multiple sites, services, or types of works. It&#8217;s often easier to find a person&#8217;s data on the web once you know one of their common usernames than it is when you know their name. Usernames are, by their nature as keys to a specific record, more unique than names.<\/p>\n<p>I also am not that fond of my definition of <strong>notability<\/strong>. It doesn&#8217;t seem to me to require numbers, but only a certain level of significant interest. However, that&#8217;s pretty hard to describe and define.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, Dave wrote me an extensive discussion of yet another concept relating to accessibility: risk.<br \/>\n<strong>Risk<\/strong> is what you have when information is accessible to some people, but not others, because there&#8217;s a risk of failure of the safeguards that prevent it from being accessible to everyone (loss or deliberate breakage), as well as a risk of legal decision that the safeguards must be removed (search warrants, subpoenas).<\/p>\n<p>Dave sums his discussion up thus: &#8220;Heightened accessibility, even if it is well-understood under normal conditions, still creates the prospect of lowered privacy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This is, I think, one of the big deals about accessibility that makes people pitch a fit about sudden increases in it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I got some offline feedback on my last entry, with the effect that I rethought a few things. Here are some of the new thoughts: Anonymity. The way I defined this previously was &#8220;being out in public without being notable&#8221;. This isn&#8217;t a very good definition, because, as Gavin pointed out, anonymity actually has a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[18,19,23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lyspeth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lyspeth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lyspeth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lyspeth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lyspeth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lyspeth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lyspeth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lyspeth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lyspeth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}